Sunday, 15 November 2015

Understanding and Applying Standards


Understanding and Applying Standards
Preet Khinda
Module5: Unit1: Activity 3





In this unit I learnt how to teach. So many modules, so much of knowledge but I can definitely say that this is the unit that has equipped me to enter a classroom full of students. This is the Unit that has made me think what exactly I would want to do in the class. I heard about a standard for the first time. And as I went about looking for one, in the school I am planning to teach, I came about a lot of lessons to be taught but not a standard. So I went online looking for standards that could collect some of the important mathematics lessons together. I found my standards in the common core for North Carolina schools. And doing all this, this is what I learnt:

Standards:

Learning standards (also called academic standards, content standards and curricula) are elements of declarative, procedural, schematic, and strategic knowledge that, as a body, define the specific content of an educational program. Standards are usually composed of statements that express what a student knows, can do, or are capable of performing at a certain point in their learning progression (often designated by "grade" or its equivalent)[1].

Unpacking a Standard




Unpacking the standards means breaking down the State Standards into the knowledge and skills students need in order to fully meet the standards.  This helps teachers and curriculum designers closely align classroom instruction and learning opportunities with the rigor found within the standards themselves.

Step 1:  Identify the standard

Step 2:  Identify what students need to know in order to reach this standard.  Nouns within the standard usually help clarify what students need to know.

Step 3:  Identify what students need to be able to do in order to reach this standard.  Verbs within the standard usually help clarify what students need to be able to do.

Step 4:  Identify the enduring understandings or "big ideas" and essential questions within the standard.  These are the concepts or generalizations that students can transfer or take with them outside of your classroom or this content area.

Step 5:  Align classroom instruction and learning opportunities with the knowledge and skills found within the standard.

All these steps will be successful if and only if the students can apply all the knowledge, taught in the lessons, in their real life. It is then that the lessons are complete. 







As I understand now, “Classroom assessment and grading practices have the potential not only to measure and report learning but also to promote it. Indeed, recent research has documented the benefits of regular use of diagnostic and formative assessments as feedback for learning (Black, Harrison, Lee, Marshall, & William, 2004)”

Classroom assessments fall into three categories, each serving a different purpose.

1.     Summative assessments summarize what students have learned at the conclusion of an instructional segment. These assessments tend to be evaluative, and teachers typically encapsulate and report assessment results as a score or a grade. Familiar examples of summative assessments include tests, performance tasks, final exams, culminating projects, and work portfolios. Evaluative assessments command the attention of students and parents because their results typically “count” and appear on report cards and transcripts. But by themselves, summative assessments are insufficient tools for maximizing learning. Waiting until the end of a teaching period to find out how well students have learned is simply too late.
2. Diagnostic Assessment sometimes known as pre-assessments—typically precedes instruction. Teachers use them to check students' prior knowledge and skill levels, identify student misconceptions, profile learners' interests, and reveal learning-style preferences. Diagnostic assessments provide information to assist teacher planning and guide differentiated instruction. Examples of diagnostic assessments include prior knowledge and skill checks and interest or learning preference surveys. Because pre-assessments serve diagnostic purposes, teachers normally don't grade the results.
3.     Formative assessments occur concurrently with instruction. These ongoing assessments provide specific feedback to teachers and students for the purpose of guiding teaching to improve learning. Formative assessments include both formal and informal methods, such as ungraded quizzes, oral questioning, teacher observations, draft work, think-aloud, student-constructed concept maps, learning logs, and portfolio reviews. Although teachers may record the results of formative assessments, we shouldn't factor these results into summative evaluation and grading.

In conclusion, I feel the teacher needs to keep a few points in mind while being an effective facilitator of active learning for the students. These can be to use summative assessments to frame meaningful performance goals. It is essential for the teacher to show criteria and models to the students in advance. During the entire learning experience, the teacher can keep showing to the students the high quality work of previous students, so that the students know exactly what is expected from them. It is also necessary, that the teacher accesses ones students before teaching. Only when the teacher has a clear idea a to the level of ones students, can the teacher plan the lesson accordingly and the ‘relevance’ part of the SMART objectives is taken care of. The next thing a teacher needs to do is offer appropriate techniques of learning. Every student is different and chooses to learn differently. Some students are into active learning when the teacher is giving a lecture where as other might be sleeping. Some might learn by watching a video and other might like to research and learn. So it is up to the teacher to offer them appropriate choices for learning. Providing feedback early and often can be a very effective tool for active learning. To serve learning, feedback must meet four criteria: It must be timely, specific, understandable to the receiver, and formed to allow for self-adjustment on the student's part (Wiggins, 1998). And last but not the least, the teachers need to encourage self-assessment and goal setting. Teachers help cultivate such habits of mind by modeling self-assessment and goal setting and by expecting students to apply these habits regularly. [2]

2.     http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov05/vol63/num03/Seven-Practices-for-Effective-Learning.aspx